JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)January 25, 2022

A- de 2022

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Cristina Pardo Schlesinger

✓Claimant Constanza Nohemi Silva Forero Y Otro

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Nulidad Sentencia De Constitucionalidad
  • Procedencia excepcional por violación al debido proceso
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de nulidad del trámite realizado en el marco del expediente D-14252.

Los peticionarios argumentaron la vulneración de los derechos fundamentales a la legítima defensa y debido proceso de 1200 trabajadores del Sena, aproximadamente, y, en ese sentido, alegaron como causal la contenida en el numeral 8 del artículo 133 del Código General del Proceso.

La Sala Plena de la Corporación decidió RECHAZAR la anterior pretensión por resultar improcedente, por no satisfacer el requisito de legitimidad.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. RECHAZAR la solicitud de nulidad formulada por Alirio Lozano Cargas, Carlos Augusto Pinto Hernández, Martha Milady Prado Peñaloza, Omar Augusto Garzón, Carlos Arturo Jiménez Vela, Dayra Stella Escobar Macualo, Esther Sofía Rubiano Muñoz y Ricardo Vergara Vargas en el marco del trámite de decisión del expediente D-14252, por ser improcedente.
  2. SEGUNDO. COMUNICAR la presente providencia a los solicitantes, con la advertencia de que contra esta decisión no procede ningún recurso.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.